Ups and Downs of Climate Change Theory

In the 19th century great scientists such as John Tyndall and Svante Arrhenius anticipated greenhouse theory, arguing (in Tyndall’s words) that “rays from the sun and fixed stars could reach the earth through the atmosphere more easily than the rays emanating from the earth could get back into space” (1863) and that concentrations of CO2 could trigger feedbacks that would account for rising global temperatures (Arrhenius 1896). This in fact became conventional wisdom until critics in the early 20th century suggested other factors to explain climate change than human production of CO2. The critics included T. C. Chamberlin who pointed to changes in oceans as a key cause, Knut Angstrom, Charles Greely Abbott and F. E. Fowle who believed water vapour would absorb infrared radiation. By 1929 G. C. Simpson was able to say confidently that CO2 could have no real effect on climate. This became the orthodoxy until Guy Callendar strongly challenged it in 1939.

[source: Fleming, Callendar Effect ]

[

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s